She pays $96 a month to live in Yellowstone National Park: 'Being here has changed my life'
Reported by CNBC · cnbc.com ·
Zoe De La Paz quit her corporate job in Chicago and in June moved to Yellowstone to work as a seamstress.
Story context
What to watch: This report cites a concrete figure ($96) — compare it against the trailing trend before treating one data point as a turning point.
Latest session change: $YSGL +1.753799442072552e+32%
How this was labelled
CNBC published this one, and Wook filed it under Markets. The automated reading is neutral, at low severity. Both of those labels come from matching words in the headline and preview against a fixed list. No editor and no AI is involved, which keeps them consistent and also keeps them blunt: they describe how the story is worded, not what it will do. It was matched to $YSGL. Matching works by reading symbols and company names out of the text, which means a company mentioned in passing gets tagged the same way as the one the story is about. The headline or preview carried 1 figure — $96 — shown above exactly as published. Nothing was recalculated. The preview above is the publisher's own wording.
When it landed
This one landed over the weekend, while the market was shut. The session change shown beside it is Friday's, and the first session that could react is Monday's. It is worth keeping the two apart: the price next to a story and the story itself run on different clocks. The publication time is whatever the publisher stamped on it. Weekends are taken into account here; market holidays are not.
Where the price is
$YSGL last traded at $0.12, +1.753799442072552e+32% on the session. That is within a tenth of its 52-week high; the year runs $0.03 to $0.12. These are the latest session quotes rather than live prices. A day's move picks up everything else that happened that day, so nothing here says this story caused any of it.
How much is being written
Wook has stored 1 story about these names in the last 30 days, 0 of them this week. None of it arrived in the last week, so the run has gone quiet. Across the whole run the wording has been close to balanced: 0% bullish, 100% neutral, 0% bearish. That is a count of how stories were worded, not what anyone thinks. Only this one came from CNBC, so the run is spread across outlets rather than driven by a single desk. 12 are listed beside this one if you want to follow the trail yourself.
What this page is not saying
The tone and severity labels come from keyword matching. They are not a forecast, not a member vote, and not a recommendation. Any figures are copied from the headline or preview rather than worked out here, and a price move on the same day does not mean this story caused it. None of this is investment advice.
Discussion
No one has weighed in yet. Start the discussion on this story.